August 10, 2021
EPA Responds To Manchin, Capito, McKinley Request To Address Lead Found In Clarksburg Drinking Water
The response from the EPA can be found here.
Washington, DC – U.S. Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and Representative David McKinley (R-WV) received a response from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on their request for the EPA to address the elevated levels of lead found in the drinking water of homes served by the Clarksburg Water System.
“The elevated levels of lead found in homes served by the Clarksburg drinking water system are concerning and must be addressed quickly,” Senator Manchin said. “I am pleased with the EPA’s timely response, but more must be done to ensure the health and safety of our fellow West Virginians. As we continue to find ways to address the concerning levels of lead the drinking water, I will push for the EPA, West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, and Clarksburg Water System to provide the residents affected with the support they need.”
“Coordination between state, local, and federal authorities is critical as we continue to monitor the situation in Clarksburg. Protecting public health remains the top priority, and together we will ensure residents impacted by elevated levels of lead receive the resources they need,” said Senator Capito.
“We are thankful for the quick response from the EPA to our questions. Our office has been working almost daily with the EPA, State of WV, and Clarksburg Water Board to address this issue and ensure the residents have access to clean and safe water. It is critical that testing and evaluation of lead levels happen quickly and that alternate water options are made available,” said Representative McKinley. “The EPA and WVDHHR must take every step possible to address this issue and assist the residents of Clarksburg.”
The Clarksburg Water System serves approximately 18,000 residents via 8,500 service connections. Additionally, the System serves as a water supply for a number of other public water systems in the area, which service an additional 38,000 people.
The Members asked the EPA to take immediate measures and respond to questions. They received the following responses:
1. Exercise immediate authorities, such as those available to the Administrator under Section 1442(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), to assist with emergencies involving public water systems by providing grants to the System. If authorities under this section have not been invoked, then what authority has EPA used to provide assistance?
a. EPA has clearly described the actions that CWB needs to complete to comply with the SDWA Order issued pursuant to Section 1431. We are pleased to also provide at your request a list of sources (attached) from which CWB can seek funding and other assistance. EPA’s Office of Research and Development has made a water supply corrosion expert available to provide technical assistance to CWB. This expert has been on several conference calls with CWB and WVDHHR to provide advice on corrosion control treatment and the work needed to develop and implement a study to determine the optimal corrosion control treatment for CWB.
2. Collaborate with the State of West Virginia, including the WVDHHR, and the System to assist in complying with the Emergency Order, including efforts to coordinate sampling activities as well as provide general sampling assistance. If EPA is not presently working with the State and the System to provide sampling assistance, then how will EPA take action to provide support?
a. You will be happy to know EPA has been actively and consistently collaborating with WVDHHR and CWB, offering technical guidance and expertise on all aspects of compliance with the Order, including sampling while carefully avoiding any violations of the Anti-Deficiency Act and the Federal Grant Cooperative Agreement Act. EPA, in conjunction with direction from the Center for Disease Control’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), provided discretionary funding that is assisting the DHHR’s Bureau for Public Health in setting up public child lead screenings with the Clarksburg Harrison County Health Department.
b. To assist CWB in its efforts, EPA has provided:
· an example of a recently completed sampling plan under the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), a blank sampling plan template and instructions, and LCR guidance documents highlighting development of a sampling plan and a materials inventory;
· technical input on appropriate sampling sites and methodology for sampling at customers’ taps;
· technical guidance on information gathering techniques CWB can use when customers request tap water sampling for lead so that CWB can efficiently develop a list of compliance sample sites based on the responses;
· guidance about alternate methods to locate lead service lines as well as technical input highlighting the risks of partial lead service line replacement;
· templates for consumer notifications of tap water lead test results, input into appropriate flushing times for consumers’ taps, and cautionary guidance about use of over-the-counter drinking water lead test kits;
· examples of customer notification guides to help residents identify if they have LSL on their property;
· a corrosion control expert from our Office of Research and Development who continues to provide guidance directly to CWB on corrosion control;
· comment to an auto-dialer message developed by CWB to notify its customers;
· a list of laboratories in the tri-state area certified to analyze for lead in drinking water to widen the laboratories where samples are sent for analysis, in response to CWB’s concern about lab capacity.
3. Provide bottled water and point-of-use filters to impacted residents served by the System. If EPA has not assisted in obtaining bottled water and point-of-use filters for impacted residents, then what help has EPA provided thus far?
a. Section 1431 of the SDWA gives EPA authority to order those who caused or contributed to the endangerment to provide alternative water supply to the affected community. The burden to comply with the order falls on the respondent. EPA can and has supported CWB by providing technical support and expertise in all matters where CWB has sought assistance. It is not EPA’s role to provide services to the recipient of an Agency enforcement action to assist the recipient in complying with that enforcement action.
The letter from Senators Manchin and Capito and Representative McKinley can be read in full here.
Next Article Previous Article